Blog Post 5

Regarding some changes that could be made in my study program, first, I'm going to say that I'm a first year student in geography, so I've only covered a small part of the studies, and I think, up to this point, it's okay. I think the level of progress between the subjects is really coherent for moving forward. I have only one complaint, and it's about the total absence of history in this career. Usually, in general, we hear about "history and geography" being taught together, so I think it's really strange that we don't have history, especially because if there's one thing that helps us understand the reasons behind changes in public policies, the economy, social paradigms, and, ultimately, changes in the territory, it's the capacity to analyze and understand the history of  places. So, I think this is a great tool that we don't have in the curriculum.

As for the workload, I think it's okay too, but it is true that you have to be organized in your studies because we have a lot of new concepts to learn, and that requires time to process them.

Finally, concerning the infrastructure, I think it's pretty poor, especially at the individual tables, because they are small, usually broken, and it's really uncomfortable to study. Also, on the second floor, the entire floor shakes with any movement, giving the sensation that it might fall at any moment.